perhaps because i read a bit of quantum physics while i was younger, i always get annoyed with the half-assed way time paradoxes get explained, that i am just that thrilled to come across literature that does it right. i guess it is due to needing to grasp an additional layer…


…to properly understand why events in time are immutable, as opposed to merely being “necessary” to fulfill the existing timeline. it properly completes the clause of not treating your audience like they cannot possibly understand causality.

Sign in to participate in the conversation

The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!